Next-Generation Electric Vehicles: Structural Battery Composites, AI-Driven Charging, and Cybersecurity

Authors

  • Abdussalam Ali Ahmed Mechanical Engineering Department, Bani Waleed University, Bani Waleed, Libya Author

Keywords:

Structural battery, carbon fiber, managed charging, ISO 15118, OCPP 2.0.1, graph neural network, reinforcement learning, vehicle-to-grid, cybersecurity, side-channel attacks

Abstract

Electric vehicles (EVs) are rapidly proliferating, driving innovation in batteries, charging, and security. This paper explores three key pillars for next-generation EVs. First, structural battery composites integrate carbon-fiber electrodes and a solid electrolyte into load-bearing parts, cutting pack weight. Recent work by Chaudhary et al. (Chalmers U., 2024) demonstrated a carbon-fiber structural battery with ~30 Wh/kg energy density and >70 GPa stiffness, retaining ~100% Coulombic efficiency over 1000 cycles. Such “massless” energy storage greatly improves system density. Second, AI-driven smart charging aligns EV load with grid needs. Managed charging shifts energy to low-price hours and reduces grid upgrades. NREL found substantial system benefits even at ~15% EV participation, and five-state modeling (NREL, 2024) showed distribution upgrade costs falling from ~$2.3B to $1.6B with managed charging. Machine learning, including graph neural networks (EV-GNN) and reinforcement learning (PPO, TD3), can predict traffic and plan charging to minimize wait times and bills. Third, cybersecurity resilience is critical. The EV charging ecosystem cars, chargers, cloud, and grid faces attacks from hardware flaws, insecure protocols, and side channels. Side-channel research (“Leaky Batteries”) shows battery power traces can reveal driver identity, routes, and occupancy with ~95% accuracy. Charging protocols are evolving: ISO 15118 Plug&Charge uses X.509 PKI for EV identity, and OCPP 2.0.1 adds formal device models and security events. Yet incidents persist: researchers have shown OCPP 1.6 can be hijacked (session disruption, code injection) and plugged-in chargers can be commandeered to destabilize grids.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Asp, L., Chaudhary, P., & colleagues. (2023). Advancing structural battery composites: Robust manufacturing for multifunctional energy storage. Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research, 4(10), 2300109.

Chalmers University of Technology. (2024). Huge step towards the structural battery of the future [Press release]. https://www.chalmers.se/en/current/news/huge-step-towards-the-structural-battery-of-the-future/

Abdussalam Ali Ahmed (2025). Synergizing Renewable Energy and Electric Vehicles: An Experimental Analysis of Grid Integration, Charging Optimization, and Environmental Impact. Journal of Insights in Basic and Applied Sciences, 1(1), 35-43

CharIN. (2022). Implementation guide to Plug&Charge (v1.2). https://www.charin.global/media/pages/technology/knowledge-base/09ce9fd6d5-1649174817/charin_implementation_guide_to_plug_and_charge_v1_2.pdf

CharIN. (n.d.). Plug & Charge overview and ISO/IEC 15118. https://www.charin.global/technology/plug-charge

Abdulgader Alsharif (2025). Global Trends in Electric Vehicle Charging Demand and Infrastructure Development. (2025). Libyan Open University Journal of Applied Sciences (LOUJAS), 1(1), 20-28.

Johnson, J., et al. (2023). Disrupting EV charging sessions and gaining remote code execution (INL/CON-23-72329 Rev. 0). Idaho National Laboratory. https://inldigitallibrary.inl.gov/sites/sti/sti/Sort_65949.pdf

Liu, Y., Zhao, J., & others. (2021). PPO-based smart charging for residential EVs. Energies, 14(17), 5402. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/17/5402

Lundström, P., et al. (2025). Electro-chemo-mechanical modelling of structural battery composites. npj Computational Materials, [Open Access]. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41524-025-01646-x

Marchiori, F., & Conti, M. (2025). Leaky Batteries: A novel set of side-channel attacks on electric vehicles (arXiv:2503.08956). arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.08956

Abdussalam Ali Ahmed (2025). Hybrid Tidal-Wave Systems with Advanced Materials for Efficient and Durable Renewable Ocean Energy. (2025). Libyan Open University Journal of Applied Sciences (LOUJAS), 1(1), 29-43.

Muratori, M., et al. (2023). Electric vehicle managed charging: Potential bulk power system benefits (NREL/TP-6A40-86875). National Renewable Energy Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.2172/2020416

National Renewable Energy Laboratory. (2024). Transportation Electrification Impact Study (TEIS) (NREL/TP-5R00-89539). https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy24osti/89539.pdf

Open Charge Alliance. (2024). What is new in OCPP 2.0.1 (White paper v1.0). https://openchargealliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/new_in_ocpp_201-v10.pdf

Virta. (2024). The global electric vehicle market in 2025. https://www.virta.global/global-electric-vehicle-market

Abdussalam Ali Ahmed (2025). From Transition to Transformation: A Comparative Engineering Study of Hybrid and Electric Vehicles. (2025). Libyan Open University Journal of Applied Sciences (LOUJAS), 1(1), 11-19.

Wood, E., et al. (2024). EV charging infrastructure trends: Q4 2023. AFDC/NREL. https://afdc.energy.gov/files/u/publication/electric_vehicle_charging_infrastructure_trends_fourth_quarter_2023.pdf

Zhang, Y., et al. (2024). EV-GNN: A graph-neural approach for EV charging station choice. Nature Communications Engineering, 1, 76. https://www.nature.com/articles/s44172-024-00213-4

Abdussalam Ali Ahmed (2025). Hybrid AI Models for Forecasting and Optimizing Solar Energy Generation Under Varying Weather Conditions. Scientific Journal for Publishing in Health Research and Technology, 1(1), 35-41

Downloads

Published

2025-08-23

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Abdussalam Ali Ahmed. (2025). Next-Generation Electric Vehicles: Structural Battery Composites, AI-Driven Charging, and Cybersecurity. Libyan Journal of Health, Science, and Development (LJHSD), 1(1), 32-44. https://ljhsd.org.ly/index.php/ljhsd/article/view/7